Author Guidelines

The process of preparing a manuscript for publication. As a component of the submission procedure, authors are obligated to verify the conformity of their submission with each of the enumerated criteria. Submissions that fail to comply with these guidelines may be returned to the authors.

Authors are kindly requested to take note that the act of submission signifies that the content has not been previously published or submitted for publication elsewhere, with the exception of a concise abstract presented in the proceedings of a scientific conference or symposium.

The manuscript can be divided into several distinct parts. These parts include the introduction, literature review, methodology, results, discussion, and conclusion. Each part serves a specific purpose in presenting the research findings and supporting arguments

The submission of the manuscript should be done in distinct files, namely the Title Page, Cover Letter, and Main Text file, which should also include any accompanying Tables and Figures.

Title Page

The title page should include: An Explanatory Title Comprising the Principal Keywords, Limited to a Maximum of 20 Words. It is recommended that the title should not include any abbreviations. A concise running title with a character limit of 40 or less. The complete names of all authors, with the last names emphasized in bold, are requested. The institutional affiliations of all authors. The acknowledgment The following is a statement regarding potential conflicts of interest. The present study was supported by financial resources provided by the institution. The primary focus of this discourse pertains to the categorization of manuscripts.

Cover letter

The following structure addresses all of the essential aspects that must be incorporated into the document.

Please address the editor who will be evaluating your manuscript by their name if you are aware of their identity. Include the date that the submission was made as well as the journal that you are offering it to. Include the title of your manuscript as well as the type of manuscript it is (for example, a review, research investigation, or case study) in the first paragraph. After that, provide a concise explanation of the history of your research, the question that you sought to answer, and the reasons behind your decision.

Your second paragraph should include a succinct explanation of what was done, the primary findings, and the reasons why these findings are significant. The third paragraph is where you should explain why the people who read the journal would be interested in the work that you have presented. You should take your cues from the objectives and scope of the journal. As an illustration, if the journal stipulates that all published work must have broad implications, you should explain how your study satisfies this requirement. Including a sentence that discusses the significance of the findings to the field is another good idea that should be considered. To conclude, it is necessary to identify the author who corresponds to the article as well as any journal-specific requirements that must be met (for example, ethical standards).

Statement made by the authors This manuscript has not been published anywhere else, and it is not currently being considered for publication by any other journal, as we have confirmed.

The manuscript has been approved by all of the authors, and they are in agreement with the decision to submit it to the Dewata Biomedicine Journal.

Original articles

The types of studies encompassed within this category consist of randomized controlled trials, intervention studies, studies evaluating screening and diagnostic tests, outcome studies, cost-effectiveness analyses, observational studies (including cross-sectional, case-control, and cohort designs), qualitative studies, and mixed methods research.

The manuscript should include a structured abstract consisting of subheadings such as title, Background & Aim, methods and materials, results, and conclusion. This abstract should be placed on the first page and should be limited to a maximum of 250 words. It is recommended that an abstract be accompanied by a set of 3 to 5 relevant keywords. Please utilize terminology from the Medical Subject Heading (MeSH) list found in the Index Medicus (http://www.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/MBrowser.html) when composing your response. It is imperative for authors to exercise caution in ensuring that the abstract accurately represents the content of the article. The inclusion of references or abbreviations is not appropriate in the abstract.

The articles should consist of a maximum of 5,000 words, excluding the Abstract, References, and Tables. Additionally, it should include up to four figures and/or tables, and a total of 30 references. The structure of the article should comprise the following sections: Title, Introduction, Methods, Results, Discussion, Limitations, Implications, Conclusion, Acknowledgement, Conflict of Interest, References, Tables, and Figures.

The Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) group has established guidelines for research papers that present the findings of a randomized controlled trial. Furthermore, it is strongly recommended to include a CONSORT flowchart diagram in the manuscript. Researchers must register their studies in a clinical trial registry that the World Health Organization (WHO) recommends in order to have their clinical trial reports published in DBJ.

Review

We cordially invite review articles pertaining to any area of research that is pertinent to the practice of healthcare field. Narrative reviews ought to be authored by individuals who are widely recognized as authorities in the respective field. These reviews should strive to provide a comprehensive and impartial examination of all facets pertaining to a specific subject matter, encompassing both the advantages and disadvantages of any contentious or uncertain elements. Review articles are required to contain an abstract that does not exceed 250 words. The main body of the article should consist of approximately 5,000-8,000 words, excluding the abstract, tables, figures, and reference list. Additionally, authors are allowed to include a maximum of 6 tables and/or figures in their review articles. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses are highly regarded in academic research, and it is recommended that they adhere to the PRISMA and MOOSE guidelines, respectively. The primary textual content ought to adhere to the following structure: Introduction, Methods, Results, Discussion, Limitations, Implications, and Conclusion.

Short communications

Short communications are concise research reports that present novel findings. These reports are limited to a maximum of 2500 words, including the introduction, main body, and references. A Short Communication typically comprises several key sections, namely an Abstract, an Introduction, Methods, Results, Discussion, Conclusion, Acknowledgement, References, Tables, and Figures.

Case reports

Case reports are exclusively deemed worthy of consideration if they possess exceptional appeal to the readership. The case report comprises several sections, including an unstructured abstract, introduction, case report, discussion, acknowledgment, and references. The maximum length for case reports should be at most 1,000 words, with a limit of 15 references and a reasonable inclusion of tables and/or figures.

Letter to the Editor/Editorial

Letters to the Editor possess a versatile structure and are occasionally published, when they provide commentary on a paper published in DBJ or address a significant matter within the field that is of wide interest to the readership.

Perspective

The present discourse aims to explore various perspectives on the given topic. Pieces of academic writing offer a fresh and distinctive perspective on established issues, fundamental principles, or prevailing ideas within a particular subject area. They put forth and provide evidence for a novel hypothesis, or engage in a discourse regarding the ramifications of a recently introduced innovation. Perspective articles typically center on contemporary advancements and prospective trajectories within a given subject matter, often incorporating primary data and subjective viewpoints.

The preparation of perspectives should adhere to a word limit of 3000, encompassing the abstract, main text, references, and figure legends. The research paper should include a concise title, a succinct abstract of no more than 250 words, a limited number of references not exceeding 30, and the inclusion of 1 or 2 figures or tables accompanied by appropriate legends.

Commentaries

Commentaries serve the purpose of directing attention towards a previously published article and offering critical analysis. They frequently utilize the findings of the article as a means to advocate for action or emphasize specific points that hold broader significance within the field. The commentaries should be limited to a maximum of 1500 words. Participants are permitted to incorporate a limited number of references, as well as one or two tables and figures, into their work. The DBJ does not mandate the inclusion of abstracts for commentaries.

Theoretical development

"Theory and Concept Development" refers to the following article categories: analysis, theory/concept synthesis, and theory/concept derivation.  Additionally, one may incorporate theoretical concerns and issues, a conceptual model, a theoretical framework, and so forth.

The primary text of articles intended for publication in the DBJ should not surpass 8000 words, inclusive of the abstract, tables, and references. The manuscript must contain a minimum of 4000 words in order to qualify as a theory and concept development paper. The primary textual content ought to adhere to the following structure: Introduction, Methods, Results, Discussion, Limitations, Implications, and Conclusion.

It is highly recommended that authors adhere to the Standard Reporting Guidelines when preparing their manuscripts. 

CONSORT: Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials
STROBE: Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies
PRISMA: Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses
STARD: Standards for Reporting Diagnostic Accuracy Studies
COREQ: (Consolidated criteria for Reporting Qualitative research)

When preparing the main text, it is important to take into consideration these fundamental criteria:

Introduction: The introduction section serves to provide a concise overview of the existing literature or background information pertaining to the subject of study. It also aims to clearly articulate the purpose and rationale behind conducting the study.

Methods: This section provides a comprehensive description of the study design, including the setting and samples, ethical considerations, measurements/instruments, data collection/procedure, and data analysis employed. When citing an established method, it is essential to provide a reference to acknowledge the original source. However, when referring to a novel method, it is crucial to provide sufficient details so that another author can replicate and perform the method accurately. In the event of drug utilization, it is imperative to provide the generic nomenclature, dosage, and method of administration. When employing an apparatus, it is necessary to provide the manufacturer's name and address within parentheses.

In order to address ethical considerations, it is imperative to acknowledge and discuss the moral implications and potential ethical dilemmas associated with a given topic or research study. In this study, it is imperative to note that prior to their participation, informed consent was duly obtained from all adult human participants, while the parents or legal guardians of minors provided their consent on their behalf. Furthermore, it is important to acknowledge that the project received approval from the relevant institutional review board, whose name shall be included.

Results: The findings should be presented using textual descriptions, tables, and visual representations. It is advisable to avoid duplicating the information presented in the tables within the accompanying text. Alternatively, it is possible to provide a citation to the corresponding table number. In order to enhance clarity and organization, it is often necessary to include sub-headings within certain sections of lengthy articles, particularly within the Results and Discussion portions.

Discussion: The focus of this section should be on highlighting the current findings and examining the differences or similarities with previous research conducted by other scholars in the same field. The repetition of detailed data in the discussion section should be avoided. The study highlights novel and significant elements, as well as the corresponding conclusions derived from them. It is highly recommended to engage in a discussion regarding the advancements in nursing practice, the development of nursing knowledge, and the implications for nursing.

Acknowledgment: The acknowledgment section should include all individuals who have made contributions to the work but do not meet the criteria for authorship. The acknowledgements section should encompass individuals who offered technical assistance, provided aid in writing, and the departmental head who offered general support. The recognition of financial and material assistance is also imperative.

Tables should be submitted in limited quantities, with the captions positioned above them. It is not advisable to present tables in the form of photographs. Explanatory matters should be placed in footnotes rather than in the heading.

Figures should be presented in a restricted quantity, accompanied by visually appealing illustrations of superior quality, and positioned on distinct pages. The captions should be positioned below. Simultaneous presentation of identical data in tables, figures, and text should be avoided.

It is advisable to incorporate tables and figures within the primary manuscript file, preferably towards the end of the document.

References: It is expected that all manuscripts are accompanied by appropriate references. A minimum of 50% of the references utilized in the study should pertain to the most recent five-year period. It is imperative for the author to ensure the accuracy and precision of references. The verification of all reference citations may pose a challenge for editors and reviewers. In order to mitigate such errors, it is recommended that the author cross-checks references with the original documents. It is advisable to utilize a tool such as a Reference Manager/Endnote for the purpose of managing and formatting references. It is imperative to adhere to the APA [bracket] reference style when formatting your references.

When utilizing abbreviations and symbols, it is imperative to employ solely recognized and accepted standard abbreviations. It is advisable to refrain from utilizing the pronoun "them" in both the title and abstract sections. In academic writing, it is customary to provide the complete term for an abbreviation before using the abbreviation itself, unless the abbreviation represents a widely recognized unit of measurement.

Copyright notice

The Journal retains exclusive ownership of accepted manuscripts, which cannot be reproduced, either in its entirety or partially, without the explicit written consent of the Editor.

Permanency of Contents

All articles published in Dewata Biomedicine Journal (DBJ) receive a DOI and are permanently published. This applies regardless of the outcome of the peer review that follows after publication.

All content, including articles that have not (yet) passed peer review, is permanently archived in OJS/PKP. All versions of all articles that have passed peer review will be archived in LOCKSS and elsewhere.

Authors can revise, change and update their articles by publishing new versions, which are added to the article’s history; however, the individual versions, once published, cannot be altered or withdrawn and are permanently available on the DBJ website. DBJ participates in the CrossMark scheme, a multi-publisher initiative that has developed a standard way for readers to locate the current version of an article. By applying the CrossMark policies, DBJ is committed to maintaining the content it publishes and to alerting readers to changes if and when they occur.

Clicking on the CrossMark logo (at the top of each DBJ article) will give you the current status of an article and direct you to the latest published version; it may also give you additional information such as new peer review reports.

In order to maintain the integrity and completeness of the scholarly record, the following policies will be applied when published content needs to be corrected; these policies take into account current best practice in the scholarly publishing and library communities:

Correction to an Article

In traditional journals, where articles are peer reviewed before publication, Corrections (or Errata) are published to alert readers to errors in the article that became apparent following the publication of the final article.

By contrast, articles in DBJ undergo peer review post publication and publication is not ‘final’ as new versions can be added at any stage. Possible mistakes that come to light during the peer review process may be highlighted in the published peer review reports, which are part of the article. Authors can publish revised versions, and any errors that become apparent during peer review or later can be corrected through the publication of new versions. Corrections and changes relative to the previous version are always summarized in the ‘Amendments’ section at the start of a new version.

Retraction

Articles may be retracted for several reasons, including:

• honest errors reported by the authors (for example, errors due to the mixing up of samples or use of a scientific tool or equipment that is found subsequently to be faulty)
• research misconduct (data fabrication)
• duplicate or overlapping publication
• fraudulent use of data
• clear plagiarism
• unethical research

For any retracted article, the reason for retraction and who is instigating the retraction will be clearly stated in the Retraction notice. The retraction notice will be linked to the retracted article (which usually remains on the site) and the article will be clearly marked as retracted (including the PDF).

An article is usually only retracted at the authors’ request or by the publisher in response to an institutional investigation. It is important to note in the context of DBJ’s publication model, that ‐ as in traditional journals ‐ a retracted article is not ‘unpublished’ or ‘withdrawn’ in order for it to be published elsewhere. The reasons for retraction are usually so serious that the whole study, or large parts of it, are not appropriate for inclusion in the scientific literature anywhere.

The content of a retracted article would only be removed where legal limitations have been placed upon the publisher, copyright holder or author(s), for example, if the article is clearly defamatory or infringes others’ legal rights, or if the article is the subject of a court order. In such cases, the bibliographic information for the article will be retained on the site along with information regarding the circumstances that led to the removal of the content.

Under rare circumstances, for example, if false or inaccurate data have been published that, if acted upon, pose a serious health risk, the original incorrect version(s) may be removed and a corrected version published. The reason for this partial removal would be clearly stated on the latest version.

Editorial Note

If there is a potential, not yet resolved, problem with an article, it may be appropriate to alert readers with an Editorial Note. Such an Editorial Note may be added, for example, if DBJ receives information that research or publication misconduct might have taken place, or that there is a serious dispute between authors or between the authors and third parties. The Editorial Note will usually be posted while further investigations take place and until a more permanent solution has been found (e.g. the publication of a revised ‘corrected’ version, or a Retraction).

Expression of Concern

In rare cases, DBJ may decide to publish an Expression of Concern, which is linked to the problematic article, if there are serious concerns about an article but no conclusive evidence can be obtained that would unequivocally justify a Retraction. This may include:

• if there is inconclusive evidence of research or publication misconduct
• there is evidence that there are problems with the article, but the authors’ institution will not investigate the case
• an investigation into alleged misconduct has not been impartial or conclusive